In the
past two months, I've been blasted out of five (5) recent children's books
by the C-word.
There I
was, reading along, having a grand time, when all of a sudden...BAM.
C-word. I'm knocked out of the story and cast adrift, the words on
the page sifting meaninglessly past a brain now completely
preoccupied with wondering why the author –with whom I'd been
getting along swimmingly up till then-- suddenly decided to descend
into hate speech.
But
don't picture me reading these books. Picture a child in a
wheelchair. A little boy with a leg-brace. A girl on crutches.
Picture them reading the books. All of a sudden they're smacked right
in the eyes with a line something like this:
He
was a cripple.
I
hadn't known she was crippled.
Why
would anyone hurt a cripple?
Why
indeed? But the child reader has been called this name on the school
playground. And yes, of course it hurt.
(By the
way, the above-- and below-- are not direct quotes from the books.
I'm not naming and shaming. Just hoping for change.)
Does it
matter how the word is presented? Whether it's in quotes or not?
Marginally. Only marginally. Remember, the target readers are
children, with a child's level of discernment.
Anyway,
in four of the five books, the word occurred at
least once without quotes.
In two
of them, it was used in the authorial voice to describe a person with
a physical disability.
In two,
it was used to describe hypothetical people, "cripples"
in the abstract.
In
three, it was used as a figure of speech.
A
crippling blow.
The
ship was crippled.
(If
you're thinking that adds up to seven: Yeah. Three of the five books used
the word repeatedly.)
I think
most people would probably be okay with the figurative use. I'm not.
For those people to whom a word has fangs, it has fangs even when
it's used figuratively. If you think about other hate speech in this
context, you'll see what I mean.
It would
also probably be okay with most people (including me) if the word was
discussed, if the fact that it's hateful and hurtful, and/or
how a character is affected by the word, was the author's point.
It's
never discussed.
We
didn't use the C-word for years, because we understood that it was
insulting and hateful. Now apparently we think it's edgy.
The
C-word, by the way, does not have fangs for all people with
mobility-related disabilities. Those who react most negatively to it,
I think, are those who were already physically disabled in elementary
school.
But
these are middle grade books. They're for people in elementary school.
So
please, can we stop calling them names?
update 8/12/14: Two days later...now I've read the word in six (6) recent middle grade books.
update 8/12/14: Two days later...now I've read the word in six (6) recent middle grade books.
No comments:
Post a Comment